I woke up early in the morning and watched this video of Elizabeth Gilbert, author of Eat, Pray, Love, talk about the source of creativity. In classical times, the artists' Muse was a divine inspiration, whereas in the last 500 years artists have embraced the notion that creative genius stems from within. For that reason many writers grow tormented as their inspiration dries up, or people even take to the fantasy that the creative process drains the writer's soul. Gilbert differs on this ego-based idea: creativity can hit you like a transcendent force, as much as you can nurture it by grinding away at your writing desk.
In my not-so-productive writing career so far, I've always believed the creative genius does come from without. The writer observes and absorbs life and her surroundings, but the truth that lives on the page is ever larger than the self. Forces come together, you do the job and create. My relative lack of writer's ego has spared me a bit of pain through the years, when I have little output or achievement to show. I write when a story strikes me, and I never change my voice just to get published. Other writers can bask in their glory; I can sit at home and think.
That doesn't excuse my lack of productivity, of course. In the last several months I haven't been writing fiction because - what an audacious thing to say - I've been plagued by the gap between an artist's mind and real life, among other things. In the mental realm everything is unsettling, constantly challenging; you contemplate on every move, endure ambiguity as a rule. But real life plays out according to norms, and the quest for certainty. In recent years I've tried hard to abridge the gap. After all, happiness isn't a solitary effort. There're compromises to make, some more worthy than others.
This morning, as I was watching the video, I remembered the pain I felt over this dilemma in my early twenties when I was starting to write. Writing was my life then: I was lonely, at odds with the world. It was my retreat, where I knew myself against the opposition and judgment of others. Then life went on a rollercoaster ride as I attempted to extend my heart and mind. This morning I remembered what I've drifted away from. I have to find the capacity to embrace it, to be at peace with it again.
In my not-so-productive writing career so far, I've always believed the creative genius does come from without. The writer observes and absorbs life and her surroundings, but the truth that lives on the page is ever larger than the self. Forces come together, you do the job and create. My relative lack of writer's ego has spared me a bit of pain through the years, when I have little output or achievement to show. I write when a story strikes me, and I never change my voice just to get published. Other writers can bask in their glory; I can sit at home and think.
That doesn't excuse my lack of productivity, of course. In the last several months I haven't been writing fiction because - what an audacious thing to say - I've been plagued by the gap between an artist's mind and real life, among other things. In the mental realm everything is unsettling, constantly challenging; you contemplate on every move, endure ambiguity as a rule. But real life plays out according to norms, and the quest for certainty. In recent years I've tried hard to abridge the gap. After all, happiness isn't a solitary effort. There're compromises to make, some more worthy than others.
This morning, as I was watching the video, I remembered the pain I felt over this dilemma in my early twenties when I was starting to write. Writing was my life then: I was lonely, at odds with the world. It was my retreat, where I knew myself against the opposition and judgment of others. Then life went on a rollercoaster ride as I attempted to extend my heart and mind. This morning I remembered what I've drifted away from. I have to find the capacity to embrace it, to be at peace with it again.

